Music Piracy Is a Good Thing

Music plagiarism is a Good thing Pirating unison is one of the most common crimes in the world that happens everyday. However, ones you read this essay, I believe you will deliberate this is carry through from a different perspective, it may not wager want such a atrocious crime afterwards all. Most thriving artists make in the tens of one million million millions every form according to eHow. com. If thats the truth, how sternly is plagiarism real hurting these pot? If practice of medicine piracy is effecting the artist so much indeed why do majority of the artists atomic number 18 living in mansions larger than the whiten Ho apply?If pirating practice of medicine hurts euphonyians income so badly it would show, and after all this time of pirating music it hasnt. Music piracy benefits artists more than it hurts, because it should be legal. Music piracy is in the principal(prenominal) committed by battalion who are everyday stack who fox second-rate i ncome jobs and dupe families who end up world sued by big drop companies everyplace grimloading music for free. It seems a bit to avid when you look at the difference in pay between the artist and the sight who download the melodic lines. ( ) say that the people who steal the music are more be similar to go to the show and buy the albums after downloading music (Ernesto).Also, people who pirate music tracks are very likely to bump an connection to the bands orartists and that will lead to them aid the shows, buying albums and merchandise. When putting this issue in perspective, record companies are just smell for money with fall out any consideration for the shipway of getting it. Record companies start suing people who feature downloaded music for ridiculous criterion of money in attempt to h honest-to-god back and scare false the fellons from downloading music illicitly. The main groups change are college kids that dont have the money.Sarah Barg was a sophomore at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Sarah received an email from a label company stating that she owed $3,000 to the record Industry Association of America (Bratton). For that amount,, Sarah would be paying $7. 87 for each song. majority of the songs she pirated were from the eighties and werent even relevant anymore, and as yet she was battling record companys in court oer them them. Sixty students like Sarah at UNL received the same similar, as well as hundreds sent out to over sixty other universities crosswise the country. Not knowing ow else to handle the situation, Barg contacted her parents and they had to shell out her settlement. I dont know what I would have done. Im lonesome(prenominal) 20 years old, says Barg. hygienic over five hundred students crossways the states have paid settlements to parry world sued. I see it as bullying, UNL freshman Andrew Johnson says, Legally, it makes sense, because we dont have the money to press back. Johnson illegally dow nloaded one song and settled $3,000 to avoid being sued for one song. The money utilize came from the 18 year olds college fund and he now has to work two jobs to encompass for his losses.The record companies seem to target those cant fight back. In cc7, major record companies such as Warner music groups, Warner Bros Records, Inc. , and Sony BMG Music Entertainment, tried to sue a young miss from Texas named Whitney harpist for illegally downloading music from stick manduction networks on the internet (Malisow). Whitney was at the time was sixteen years old and was being sued for a minimum of $750 per song when Whitney downloaded thirtyseven songs. That is a little over $20,000 and she is unless sixteen years old.Harper tried to use the Innocent Infringer Act that would reduce fees to $200 per song. In order to accomplish that, Harper had to prove she was unaware of the copyright righteousnesss by claiming that the copyright notice placed on cds were not on the level shar ing networks on the Internet therefore she was unaware. The companies referred to the sixteen-year-old as a long term large infringer of copyright laws. Harper warned that if the companies won the compositors fiber that downloading music gain the Internet could neer be innocent infringement. The Harper chance is one the few after many years still going through with(predicate) federal court.The companies had express they were going to get going transitioning away from suing individuals and find better center of designateing the issue. After years of record companies using an intimidation method to fix the pirating problem, it got them nowhere because the amount of pirates only went up, and the efforts by the companies were in most cases useless. According to the surround Street Journal, they attempted suing many whizz mothers, a thirteen-year-old girl, and a curtly peope. The young approach is for the companies to work with Internet dish providers and when music is ei ng pirated the user receives a exemplar that they will lose Internet answer if they continue(WSJ. com). The companies still reserve the right to sue if someone is a heavy stunner or has ignored several warnings, unless even with this new system, it still seems like the companies are only out for money, barely in an attempt to escape veto attention from the media, they change their approach. According to The Independent, people who illegally download music in like manner spend more money on music, concerts, merchandises than anyone else.The Secretary of State for Business, Peter Mandelson, stated that the record companies new approach to snatch up down on illegal down loaders by cutting off internet service could potentially harm the music industry more than help it. The people who file share are the ones who are fireed in music. They use file sharing as a stripping mechanism. The artists also have mixed opinions over file sharing, some such as James Blunt and Lily Allen a re anti-piracy and Shakira is pro-piracy(Shields). Sites have come out with monthly bills for unbounded music plans that seem fairer.Some artists dont feel affected by file sharing and brave out the fact that piracy creates a bigger fan base for them. Bands like Angels and Airwaves have produced free records so copyright wasnt an issue. They pick up that the fans will still come see them play and record sales arent the only thing to being in a successful band. Some artists dont seem to commit that. Most artists make plenty off of record sales even with a piracy problem, so court cases and law suits on everyday people by record companies seems a bit jealous and selfish.Even with the new laws, they are still simplyton to stop this unstoppable problem. Today music piracy is referred to as a dead issue. Most cases that are still pending are being dropped. This year a $54,000 fine on a genius mother of four was dropped by the U. S. govern Court Judge, Micheal Davis, who stated p iracy is no longer monstrous and shocking. The need for bullying cannot justify a two million verdict for stealing and distributing twenty-four songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music(physorg. om). doubting Thomas Rasset was convicted in 2007 and was ordered to pay $220,000, but the judge who presided over the trial called off the verdict, saying it was wholly disproportionate and oppressive. Her case was one of the thousands that had actually made it to court. In 2011, with new laws, these cases should not be disregarded about. The people who lost cases should be compensated and apologized to because they did nothing other than have an interest in the artist.